home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
001037_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Wed Oct 18 00:00:59 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
3KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA018049659; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:59 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from pulm1.accessone.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA017709642; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:43 -0700
Received: from 206.64.63.166 (jeric.accessone.com) by pulm1.accessone.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA24275; Tue, 17 Oct 95 23:53:44 PDT
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 95 23:53:43 PDT
Message-Id: <9510180653.AA24275@pulm1.accessone.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jeric@accessone.com
Subject: Re: Questions about ScreamerNet II
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
<---- Begin Forwarded Message ---->
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 23:48:14 -0700
From: ontarget@ix.netcom.com (George O'Hanlon )
Subject: Re: Questions about ScreamerNet II
jeric@accessone.com sent this message:
>
>Question about ScreamerNet II:
>
>Is the host machine relegated to be SIMPLY a host, and nothing else? Or can
>that instance of LW also be rendering?
>
>OR, is it practical to start another instance of LW on the host machine, and
>have it render?
>
>OR, is it possible for the host machine to see ITSELF as a rendering client?
>
I was told by tech support at Newtek that the host machine is simply that a host
and
nothing else. My host machine has dual Pentiums and "sees" itself (one of the
dual
Pentiums, I presume). I haven't tried to start two instances of LW on my host
machine
to see what it does, but I can't imagine it doing the work of two for one. The
question is not so much CPU, but what happens to RAM in such a scheme? No?
<---- End Forwarded Message ---->
Hmmmm, it would seem to (ignorant) me that ScreamerNet administration would not
be all that RAM intensive, nor processor intensive. So, the question is still
begging.
****************************************************************************
** jeric@accessone.com | Synergy Graphix & Animation
** Welcome to Seattle, have a latte'! | Technical Subjects a Specialty!
** Don't make me force it down your throat.....
****************************************************************************
--
jeric@accessone.com sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com